osbornmaledon
 
AZAPP UPDATE 


Arizona Supreme Court holds that a fact witness may also offer expert opinion testimony based on personal observation and participation without violating the One Expert Rule.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that any person aggrieved by a Director of Gaming’s licensing decision (and not just the license applicant) may appeal that decision to the Arizona Racing Commission.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that filing a complaint for special action relief does not qualify as timely review of an administrative decision under the Arizona Administrative Review Act.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds estate executor’s disclosures are insufficient for other beneficiaries’ damages claims.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that recording a notice of trustee’s sale does not constitute notice of debt acceleration.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a court must decide whether a party’s claims are subject to arbitration before addressing the merits of the claims; if the court finds the claims are subject to binding arbitration, it lacks the authority to address the merits.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that a majority of the Arizona Corporation Commission cannot prevent one commissioner from exercising investigative authority under article 15, section 4 of the Arizona Constitution.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds Arizona law did not mandate the Arizona Department of Economic Security to participate in the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation Program.
LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
© Osborn Maledon, P.A., All rights reserved.
View this email in your browser
You are receiving this email because of your relationship with Osborn Maledon P.A.. Please reconfirm your interest in receiving emails from us. If you do not wish to receive any more emails, you can unsubscribe here.

2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100, Phoenix, AZ, 85012